Awaz: Robot Psychologist

Robot Psychologist
by Awaz

As a robotics programmer I’m frequently asked; just what does psychology have to do with your line of work? I mean, why take a bachelors degree in something so unrelated to your profession.
The question is not a straightforward one to answer. My position is that an inquiry for knowledge comes from within. The observation of one’s immediate environment the ideal place to start. This year my most present being was Robert, a large white painted industrial robot.
Once coded the destiny of this trained monkey will be to toil endlessly in a factory. The program consist of lifting rock and mineral laden buckets; from a feeder conveyor, weighing them, and emphatically tossing the contents into one of several nearby crushing machines.
Destined to be a blue collar member of society, I began to teach him the necessary commands. Machine Code Commence: Pick bucket stop, If BucketWeight equals X then do Y stop. Else if … and ad nauseam stop.
Long days and late night coffees inherently led to errors in machine coding. Erroneous commands would bring the program screeching to a halt. Debugging the code frequently revealed a contradictory command. A move instruction comparable to the following; Go RightLeft. An obvious impossibility.
I was elated and far from frustrated. I’ve got it! This is similar to when confused people appear rooted to the spot. Seemingly incapable of moving from their position. Go left. Go right. The program that circles in one’s head has stumbled across an un-executable command.
Through an examining of human behaviour I began to see a resemblance with robots. Like machines, humans also appear to follow a pre-programmed script; Human code commence: If 7am wake up stop, if day equals WorkDay then go to place of employment stop… The idea captivated me. Psychologist hypothesize that we are beings of habit, but is this really just another way of saying we follow a structured program? One that we participated in creating and actively go about modifying with each new experience?
Human beings are obviously a lot more complicated than simple factory robots and the idea that we are unconscious beings blindly actioning a coded script is difficult to process at first. However, as I entertain this idea my mind flies along tangents of endless possibilities. And still the question remains; are humans just more complexly programmed machines?

Edward Dawson: Rte

Rte

Hello, my name is Edward Dawson. I have a wide range of interests, and these include spiritual knowledge, ancient languages, and ancient history. Recently these three came together along a line of historical research.

I occasionally write for The History Files, a massive online world history website run by Peter Kessler. Most of what I do for Peter is analyze the names of old European tribes to discover their meanings. While investigating the names of old German/Scandinavian tribes I ran across the German legend, recorded by civilization to the south, of Mannus and his three sons. Mannus of course means man, so we can’t regard these as real people, but instead a distorted legend of ancient German history. So according to what was written down, the three sons of Man would be (phonetically in English) Ingway, Istway and Hermin/Ermin. Ermin is of course a form of the ancient Indo-Iranian god called Varuna in India, also known as Ouranos/Uranus in Europe. I had the most trouble with Ingway, whose stem ing- I eventually realized was a cognate of the Avestan/Old Iranian word anghu – meaning life, being, spirit, existence, (extended meaning) the world, people of the world. This only came after I noticed a number of Avestan words beginning with ‘a’ had cognates in German languages beginning in ‘i’. This included . . .

Istway. I scratched my head for quite a while over why the hell a ‘son’ of Man would have a name starting with the verb to be, ist. It was not until I began looking at the second half of that name did I understand. The word pronounced ‘way’ (in the original -vae) means exactly what the modern English word ‘way’ means: a path, road, route, or by extension, anything to follow. But that makes perfect sense because English is a German language.

So Istway is the path to follow of what is. That sounds like one of the words for truth to me, truth is what is.

Parallel to this historical research I also was curious about something in Hindu philosophy called Rte. In reading about it I saw references to its co-origin in a Zoroastrian philosophy called Asha, where it was originally written as ‘Arte’. In a flash I saw it. Rte and Arte were the verbs to be, cognate with the older English word ‘art’. I looked up ash- in Avestan too and sure enough asha means truth, righteousness, world order, eternal law, fitness; and asti means is, or in German ist, with the ‘a’ converted to an ‘i’.
So what were the Germans doing following an Indo-Iranian philosophy? The next clue came from genetics.

There are two main ways of following the ancestry of people by gender. In women you use the mitochondrial genetic code, and to follow male lines you use the Y chromosome genetic code. Indo-Europeans predominantly have a code called R1, with some peoples possessing the R1a variants, and others the R1b variants. The R1a is found in Balts, Slavs, Indo-Iranians . . . and some Germans. Closest to the Germans geographically were the Balts and Slavs. But the Germanic languages do not show a basis in Baltic or Slavic tongues. They do show influence by Indo-Iranian. This indicates that long ago some steppe nomads, probably proto-Iranians of some sort, made it to Denmark, and judging by the genetic makeup of Germans, mixed with Old European, and also Celtic people.

Above I have persistently used the word ‘Iranian’ instead of the true word, the real word. The real word is offensive to me and also every every decent person, but at this point I must show it, with the disclaimer that I think the Nazis were monsters. The word Iran is a modern spelling of the original word Aria, which we usually spell Arya, as in Aryan. What does the word mean? It is the verb to be, used as a noun. Understand that? Good. So let’s go back to using Iranian instead.

For many years I have noticed that Hindu philosophical writings such as Upanishads were often stated in a flat, matter-of-fact manner which looked eerily similar to the way Germans write, and more importantly, the way Germans think. None of that whimsical, poetic style of Celts, no; more like a mechanic’s manual than the exalted language of a mystic.

So what is that? It is the flatly stated exact existence. It is saying what is. Rte, or Arte, is the folk philosophy of nomadic Indo-Iranian peoples. It is a no frills, no imagination, no overstatement approach to truth. It is practical and utile in application, and this includes a practical, utile approach to spiritual knowledge.

We have inherited this style of thought from these ancient people of the steppes. Keep using this approach. It works.

Edward Dawson